Why do I build so many spaceships?


Up early again on Saturday – no work today – a whole day dedicated to whatever I want to do.  What shall I do?  Hmmm, … grey plates, transparent yellow bricks… how many hinges do I have in stock.  Stupid brain!  How predictable!  Looks like I’m going to be building a Classic Space model again.


At breakfast with the family drinking my coffee… didn’t quite catch what the wife was saying.  “Hello, were you even listening” she resigns herself to asking.  And still I’m thinking: if I rotate that row of angled bricks it will align perfectly with one of those beautiful honeycomb pieces… what was that set from 1986 called again?  Googling on my phone for some images; typing in ‘Classic Space Lego 86’… or was it 1987. She sighs and clears the plates away.


Mid-morning, second pot of coffee ready, on my hands and knees in the bedroom surround by several hundred blue and grey bricks.  Turn up the Jean Michelle Jarre on the stereo – Equinox perfect for the mood.  The front door slams shut and the voices of the wife and children fade off down the street as they set off to do something ‘constructive’ with their weekend.  Meanwhile I’m constructing the most epic space ship yet.  “Prepare for the ride of your life”, I impart to my trusty crew of yellow-faced astronauts.  Us guys go back a long way you know.


Lunchtime refuelling, time to leave the hangar and join the civilians back in the rest room… sorry I mean join the family in the dining room.  I start to explain to my son what’s going on upstairs.  “It is going to be amazing”, I tell him, “I’ve found a way of aligning a row of angled bricks with those old honeycomb pieces”.  “Daddy it sounds like all the other spaceships you’ve built” he notes in the bored tone only a 7-year old can affect.  Supress the annoyance, he’s only small, he obviously can’t appreciate the innovation I’m trialling here.  This technique will usher in a whole new set of brick alignment techniques for us builders working in the post-86 Classic Space paradigm.


Some challenges throughout the afternoon, but after the brainwave that recognised how a couple of technique pins would secure those v-wings, she’s ready.  What a ship, better than me and the little guys could have hoped for.  Let’s get this baby photographed and online.   And as the thrill of sharing fades out, I settle down for a glass of wine with my dinner with my wife.  Talk of LEGO spaceships subside and normal relations return.

I’m ill, I’m obsessed, 32 Classic Space models this year so far, and the itch still needs to be scratched.  How many space models does one man need to make to be satisfied?   Time to begin some analysis I think.


Leaning back on my metaphorical couch, the analysist’s voice chimes, “tell me about your childhood.”  I’m five again, and ripping open the packet of a small LEGO space scooter. Grey pieces scatter across the carpet, and my little hands slots the first oxygen tank onto the torso of my first astronaut.  Everything is heady with nostalgia and meaning. The sound of the bricks clicking, the sunlight from the patio doors filtering through the transparent green bricks, the fake moonscape on the discarded packet.  And I feel warm and safe.

For the first time in my young life I had managed to successfully follow a set of instructions.  The prize an amazing space vehicle I could hold in my hand.  My self-esteem had just grown a little, and the world around me transformed.  Suddenly I could see the kitchen worktop as a landing strip and the garden a wonderful new planet to explore.


This is where the obsession begins. When you build a spaceship you find a new way to explore your ordinary everyday life.

I hear my analyst calling me back to the present. “tell me now why do you build so many spaceships?”  The answer seems easy now: long long ago, in galaxy far far away I gave up on seeing the world as a boring place.  The next morning my son has been up in his bedroom for a while, and now he’s bounding down the stairs holding something.  “I’ve made you some rovers to go with your spaceship.” Perhaps somehow the space ship building gene has passed down a generation.  Perhaps neither of us are prepared to see the world in boring grey quite yet… much better to see it in grey, blue and transparent yellow.


My wife looks over at us both happily.  “Are you going to share his models with your friends online?”  she asks.  “Of course, they’re great” I say.  And then I seal the deal….”so what are you going to build next?”


LEGO and Philosophy: Constructing Reality Brick by Brick – Book Review


This Review was first published on New Elementary last year.

Neal Stephenson in Seveneves, his 2015 epic speculative novel of human survival following a catastrophic cosmic event – the destruction of the moon – describes the technology that allows the quick assembly of the space craft in terms of an element based kit language reminiscent of LEGO building.  In fact he explicitly uses the phrasing ‘LEGO-like’. On this hinges the premise that humanity will endure the worst of times through ingenuity and creative thinking, mediated through the limited resources and components of this restricted technological system.  It is an unusually positive assessment as to what our combined intellectual endeavours might achieve in an era often obsessed with the critical appraisal of our species’ actions and the gloomy prognoses that follow.

This same optimistic spirit runs through the selection of essays gathered together in Roy Cook and Sondra Bacharach’s newly edited book LEGO and Philosophy: Constructing Reality Brick by Brick.  The twenty-one studies that make up the collection are written by a host of new and established academics from some of North America and Europe’s best universities.  Broadly themed around the topics of creativity, ethics and rules, identity, consumption and culture, and metaphysics and maths, the aim is to cover a wide intellectual base, in an attempt to answer the question posed by Cook and Bacharach in their introduction: ‘how deep and profound could a little plastic building block be?’, and like Cook and Bacharach these essays resoundingly reply: ‘the answer is “very”!’

As a part of the Blackwell Philosophy and Pop Culture Series the book adheres to a no-nonsense editorial style that favours legibility and accessibility; a rare thing in a field such as philosophy, which often excludes the casual reader.  Each of the studies here allows the philosophically uninitiated to dive into the arguments presented by their authors. Ideas are clearly explained and interesting observations succinctly and expertly arrived at.  Whilst still very much situating themselves in, and adding to, a wide range of academic studies, from the psychology of play to the analysis of popular culture, there is a place in each of these essays for the LEGO enthusiast to learn more about what, why and how their love of the brick operates.

From the opening essay, Mary Beth Willard’s ‘Constructing Creativity’ there is a sense that LEGO building improves and aids human experience by developing our potential to play and create.  Ward’s argument explicitly breaking down the myth that LEGO as a toy is good because it is creative, suggesting instead that it is the simplicity and effectiveness of the system that encourages creativity to develop, moving those who use it quickly and happily onto a path towards virtuosity.  LEGO bricks, she argues, are a highly successful tool, able to harness our imaginative potential by helping each of us to practice, improve and even master that uniquely human faculty of creative expression.

Michael Gettings in his ‘LEGO Ideas and Intellectual Property’ from the same creativity section of the book takes a very different angle to these questions – fan expectation.  From my own LEGO enthusiast’s perspective, and having read the online message boards for years, it is a marvellous experience to see the trained philosopher pull apart the pedants’ arguments that modifications to a LEGO Ideas project by the LEGO Group, so as to prepare it for market, qualify as a deceit or fundamental change of model.  In amongst the arguments that debunk this opinion Gettings again shows us something special about the LEGO brick’s capacity to generate originality.


A tale of two time machines, the Back to the Future DeLorean submitted to LEGO Cuussoo…

Lego Cuusoo 21103 Back to the Future Delorean time machine box instruction model parts

and the model release by the LEGO Group, discussed in Michael Gettings ‘LEGO Ideas and Intellectual Property’.

As a sometimes writer on the philosopher Martin Heidegger – I teach various literary and aesthetic theories at Goldsmiths, University of London – Ellen Miller’s ‘Building and Dwelling with Heidegger and LEGO Toys’, appealed to both the philosophy and LEGO nerd in me.  The subsection entitled ‘Emmet as Existentialist’ eliciting a well deserved wry smile.  Her concluding statement though provided genuine food thought, noting that: ‘Dwelling and building in worlds of LEGO toys is one way to sustain the awe and wonder needed for authentic building and philosophising.’

Roy Cook’s own contribution to the collection ‘Ninjas, Kobe Bryant and Yellow Plastic: The LEGO Minifigure and Race’ shifts the focus away from play, to consider the political and social potential of LEGO creations.  By playing out the intended idealism of the racially non-identifiable era of yellow minifigures against the various flesh tones found in the post-franchise sets, Cook explores the illustrative capacity of the system of identify found in the LEGO minifigure.  Rather than suggesting that an earlier idealistic world of undifferentiated yellow smiling faces was in some way morally reprehensible, he argues that the complications generated by the confrontation of this simple ideal with the racial complexity of current franchise sets provides a forum for important questions regarding racial identification, social context and prejudice to be better understood and potentially confronted.


Tak Toyshima’s ‘Old School Wednesday:Racial Justice LEGO style’ discussed in Roy Cook’s essay ‘Ninjas, Kobe Bryant and Yellow Plastic: The LEGO Minifigure and Race’

If one of the essays here could sum up the tone of the book, Sondra Bacharach and Ramon Das’ ‘LEGO Values: Image and Reality’ might be the best case in point.  Together they question whether the utopian and overtly positive social image the LEGO Group paints of itself is sustainable, via the well documented Greenpeace critical video made to highlight the company’s links to oil giant Shell. The answer comes back, that despite the problematic contradictions inherent in any multinational business operation, it remains too easy to malign the positive approaches made by the company and not hope that other toy manufacturers emulate the imperfect but aspirational approach that the LEGO group aspires to.

So whilst the LEGO Group and its products may not yet embody a utopian reality, in a world experiencing dark and troubled times, this book’s authors would seem to suggest that by playing, building and thinking with LEGO bricks we keep our utopian hopes alive. This book not only makes this point in numerous ways, it provides what all good research purports to do, it lays the foundations for future work.  To name drop my own blog, it sets the stage for building future debates.  If you have even the slightest inkling that something serious is going on in the LEGO world, something positive and potentially culturally transformative, then these collected essays provide no better starting place to for your own thinking.

The Quest for Europa: a LEGO collaboration

LEGO collaborations bring the community to life; the bigger and more ambitious the better!  One such collective I’ve been honored to join and contribute to is the loosely termed ‘Private Club.’   Under the guidance of its brainchild Pico van Grootveld we have twice come together to present expansive collaborative space scenes rendered through his formidable photographic editing skills.  On the eve of the unveiling of the second of these mammoth endeavours, Building Debates plays host to an overview of the project and hear thoughts from Pico and a number of the other key collaborators about its creation.

pt70mIt - Imgur

A slice of fortune seekers trying to find their luck on Jupiter’s moon Europa. After the discovery of water under its icy crust, several investigated areas revealed the presence of ABS. Moments later… 

The completed Quest for Europa diorama can be viewed here.

I hand you over to Pico now to set the scene.

Project Origins

It all started when a group of Lego enthusiasts came together in a posh group aptly named the ‘private club’ over on Mocpages. Different folks of all ages from all over the globe sharing stories, asking questions, the usual stuff. One day in 2014 fellow builder Stephan Niehoff dropped a poll to see who’d be interested in a digital collaboration (here’s the original post).


So time passed and things became more polished through group conversation. The idea was expanded and a common theme of interest picked. The collaboration would revolve around different factions searching for the precious element ‘ABS’, or absinite.


The First Chapter: Mining Frenzy

The first chapter told the story of a mining frenzy that followed the discovery of the element. A collaborative build with a variety of creations that went from planetside bases, asteroid fields, mining ops, sector security to alien species and of course space pirates! The final tableau is on display here.


The Second Chapter: The Quest for Europa

After publishing, again some time passed and the second chapter was in the making. This time the real life discovery of water on Europa got things ticking. ‘What about an underwater world unknown to mankind, let’s explore!’. So again we made a roster and let everyone pick their spot.


With different layers in the grid, there was plenty of choice for everyone. Space, planet, planet crust, water, deep sea, sea bottom, examples of the layouts can be seen here.

gG4pgXs - Imgur
We left the choice of build free so as to let creativity do its thing. All was possible from an exploration team to lurking creatures.

Builders Experiences

Following Pico’s account of the collaboration set-up, some of the key builders involved in the project shared their thoughts on the project.  Each providing their contribution to the project’s fantastical narrative and reflections on the creative project.

Pico Van Grootveld

Narrative: The Tequilatron agenda

As life thrives on planets over multiple quadrants, demand for spirits is high. The tequila serving syndicate has to keep the liquor pouring and the condiments a plenty. Whether it’s the growing of limes on blue planets or harvesting deep underground salt deposits on rocky ‘roids, the right equipment is crucial to get the job done right. Introducing the underwater model of the Roid Jumper, the Roid Diver can withstand higher pressures and is equipped the technology needed to source salt rich deposits.


Reflections on the build

With Tequilatron making a debut with the Tequila Tuk Tuk  in the Classic Space Pocket Money contest (an idea of David and David), the line developed along the way in several contests, games (Rutherford & Goldman’s D.A.2.) and collabs.



To keep things consistent and fitting within the storyline, I thought it best to stick with the lime and grey. I would see a modified Roid Jumper equipped to dive and mine in the deep. So the cockpit got fortified to whitstand high pressures, an arm was replaced by a mining laser and the top got a big lamp to lighten up the abyss. To add to the scenery, red ABS crystals were added as well as a strolling diver and marker buoys. The idea was to get the share of the resource while it was around. The divers would attach the full tanks to the buoys and release them to the surface, where logistics would pick up and ship. The whole logistic aspect as well as the defense of the precious goods are the themes I like most. The most fun, though, is to be had with the whole ‘bringing things together’. It’s a nice thought of having fellow builders from over multiple continents adding their creativity to a concept. While, in this case, real life logistics would get in the way, the digital collaboration type is just perfect. I really enjoy the different angles people take on a subject, each in their own respective and distinctive style. I have the honour of mixing it up and praying for an end result that puts a smile on everyones’ face!

Topsy Creatori

Narrative: The Sub design story

After the relaxation of ‘The Mining Frenzy’, the time was right for the first meeting of the Resources on Europa Strategy Team or REST, in the team’s favorite polished corner of their favorite posh bar, The Private Club. Team member, sister of Dame Darkla, and engineering genius, Wacky Wanda, attended the meeting after having recently been refreshing her knowledge of Platonic solids by scanning the web’s mathematical sites. As the meeting progressed and post meeting discussions continued, Wanda, armed with this refreshment of past solid learning, realized that a mining submarine in the shape of one such Platonic polyhedron just might be the design answer to small volume cargo packing of drilling submarines for transportation to Europa in cargo spacecraft. Wanda’s design lab, Technic Bulldog, quickly determined a cuboidal design would be the best. The drill sub was even built with a propitiatory exterior surface metallic membrane material featuring faced-centered cubic packing as opposed to body-centered cubic packing of its metallic atoms. And finally, Wanda wanted her dear friend and Astro-geologist, Marina Bleu, to pilot the first sub.


Reflections on the build

Just like Wanda, I too had just happened to have been refreshing my knowledge of Platonic Solids. So, when all of us Private Club friends made the decision to add another chapter to our ABS Space Resource Saga I had already been thinking about building a Platonic Solid with LEGO. Now, I wanted my solid to be, well, for lack of a better word… SOLID! I didn’t want to just use LEGO pieces for my polyhedron’s edges and vertices leaving its faces open like so many builders had been doing! So, I decided my contribution to our project would be a drilling sub that would have the shape of one of the Platonic Solids. Now I know my own limitations, so I decided to build a cuboidal submarine. Not having a large quantity of any one colored LEGO piece, I began by designing my structure using LDD. I found it was best to build up individual or 2 neighboring cube face structures from the outside in, then grouping them, and finally sliding the various groups together to form the ‘cube’. Of course, LDD gave me a great estimate for the number of LEGO pieces I would need. And naturally, the building process for the actual physical sub did not progress without some modifications and tweaks!

Matt Rowntree

Reflections on the build

My thought on the collaboration: Absolutely! Having built for Mining Frenzy and having a blast doing something so weird and out there, I couldn’t pass up another opportunity with this crazy crew. Having also worked on collaborations of all sorts as well, I find the freedom and constraints here more appealing to my own building ethos. Plus, not having to photo edit my work appeals to my laziness. Thank you Pico! But the added bonus of a master like Pico taking charge in that aspect is always worth it.
Building ideas: Well, I really only had only one vision as soon as I heard the idea. I grew up loving Kubrick and 2001: A Space Odyssey. It was one of those films that couldn’t have been more perfect for me and my development at a critical moment. Turned me on to Clarke and from there I found many superb authors to really absorb and dive into. So when 2010: The Year We Make Contact came out, I was understandably so pissed off and disappointed in spite of having Scheider, Mirren, Lithgow, and Balaban on board. I’ll grant that the movie was not bad; however, I did not want any answers to the questions raised by 2001. The mystery was completely deflated. And because of that, I thought of the monolith as just another piece of junk. Then with the discovery of possible water hidden underneath the frozen crust of Europa, I couldn’t help but think of a pair of ice fishing aficionados lucklessly pulling one up from the depths.

The final build: I didn’t want just a simple pair of figures ice fishing, I wanted a couple characters having a REALLY crappy day ice fishing. I have them pulling up other “junk” and casting it aside in a pile. But I didn’t want just junk, I wanted other relics that would give the monolith an even lower level of importance. The Ark of the Covenant and a golden statue are parked back there along with a hull piece from a Helicarrier, a Wurlitzer, a miniature trireme, and a bunch of rare Lego pieces including a hanger, a metal Technic crane hook, a pen brick, the original Han frozen in carbonite, and of course a Scala potty. The toughest part of the build was figuring out to use white macaroni pieces to replicate the sides of a large fishing hole cut with an ice drill, which is sitting behind Phat Mac there. It’s a Stihl. 😉 The entire build was supported as it cantilevered out from the back by the lower half of the submerged monolith.
Matt’s brain not on drugs: The story behind the characters and what I envisioned while building. I’ll post a link to the story along with an edited main photo of my contribution after the big reveal. Don’t worry, it’s what you all expect. 😉

Caleb Inman


So, there were some engineers on Earth who were married to biologists and artists, sports players and idealists of all sorts. And these engineers had a private design business, creating exploration vehicles for various space environments. The absinite craze launched the greatest adventure through space and time since the California Gold Rush. Everyone wanted a piece of the action. This small firm was no exception.

The engineers wanted to build something practical, competitive… And fast. They wanted to get in and out before the competition. Their wives and husbands wanted something creative. Something organic, and inspired. Because they all lived on Earth, the biologists said it should be modeled after an Earth-dwelling creature, even an extinct one. The artists wanted it to be aesthetically pleasing, creatively disproportionate. The sports players wanted it to be tough, and powerful, and memorable. The engineers just wanted something practical.

But a happy wife makes a happy life, and the lady engineers in the group decided their husbands’ ideas had merit. Putting their heads together, the engineers created MABOFA, or Mobile Apparatuses Based On Fearsome Animals. This wave of spaceships and mining equipment included rhinos, condors, snakes, wolves, sharks, and dinosaurs, to name a few. The idea was to intimidate the competitors and any other natural creatures that may be out in space, just hidden from view.

When Europa was announced as ABS-positive, the firm scrambled to create an aquatic mining scout. Expanding their line of shark-resembling products, the “Little White” was created. It served every purpose of the original creators except one: it wasn’t the most intimidating creature in the ocean.

Reflections on the build

Personal background: When I made this, I wanted to challenge myself in two ways. I wanted to create something organic, and I wanted to work in black, which is notoriously hard to photograph. I worked pretty randomly on different parts of this creation, not having too much direction until one piece of the manta or the shark sub just worked. I had recently purchased the skyhopper and wanted to reuse the windows. The dual-tone sticker made this the perfect opportunity, with the half-grey, half-white color scheme on the shark.

Both of these models were insanely fragile. Since creating this, I have become somewhat better at building sturdy models. It is still an area where I struggle, but I have not quite reached the level of despair I experienced when propping the shark up for the fortieth time. I’m pretty sure that I used thin black string to hold the sub up and edited it out in post-processing. Come to think of it, the entire MOC may have been suspended above the ground, in front of an evenly lit blue brick background.

This prompt was really fun and I was stoked to join this crew after their first collab. It is always exciting to work with great minds like those in this group, so I am honored to be included in this awesome adventure. The idea was very creative and surprisingly challenging. Pico is a fantastic editor, and if any behind-the-scenes information ever gets shared about what our team started with, you’ll understand what I mean, and just what he went through to pull it all together. It’s really marvelous, and has been a lot of fun.

Tom Remy

Narrative: LABCO News – The OPACIFIED Department on Europa

After having dried out the ‘roids in the Terpon Cluster, the Liquid ABS COmpany joined the party under Europa’s ice crust. Soon they realised that, whereas most of their competitors swept large amounts of absinite off the oceanic floor at massive operating costs, they could manage to obtain the precious material more easily. A certain species of giant worm thrived in the abyss, mainly feeding on creatures that live on the ABS-saturated oceanic floor. Soon the LABCO realised that the worm’s digestive system rejected crystals of pure absinite.

A daughter company was created to use the OPACIFIED technology on Europa, which stands for Organically Produced ABS by Catalyse of Inert Faeces Into Exploitable Detritus. The job, consisting of following the worms until the absinite, well… gets out, is boring and time-consuming, but avoids many of the jovian moon’s dangers. A diving bell signals to a little collector-submarine when the time is right. Unfortunately this particular event is followed by the creature’s lunch time, which can be a problem if the diving-bell can’t reach the surface… Those pesky fishermen!


Reflections on the build

Mainly an excuse to use my growing bowed slopes collection and my Duplo for the background, the build itself didn’t take too long and didn’t involve complicated techniques. Instead, I tried to remain simple, especially concerning the colours. I was looking for a good contrast between the water and  the submarines, and a camouflage pattern for the worm. But above all, I wanted to go on with this exciting and rewarding collaboration started with Mining Frenzy! As for chapter 1, Pico did a great job organizing the setting, and it’s nothing compared with the work he put into cutting, gluing, editing, lighting, fogging and in the end making something beautiful out of our bricks! Hope you’ll enjoy the end result as I did!

David Alexander Smith

Narrative: Ecological Preservation Investigators SUB

When the absinite rush began, the outer reaches of the solar system were put at serious ecological risk.  With leaking tequila and flying drill bits aplenty across Europa someone had to ensure the indigenous lifeforms were not disrupted.  And being the sensible people they were the ecologists designed a sea-horse modelled sub.  Why, because of course all life on Europa would be sea-horse shaped, and they really really wanted to fit in.  Whether this was true or not all the divers agreed that a sea-horse sub was a beautiful thing and more fun to drive than a Ferrari.  It now bumbles around the mid level sea keeping its sensors alert for any illegal mining activity.


Reflections on the build

The project allowed me to investigate a further creature based vehicle following on from my space dinosaurs.  With the underwater theme allowing to make a nod the Aquazone’s yellow and blue sets rather than the classic space grey and blue.  A fun and I believe unique build, I love how Pico has accentuated the yellow so that it pops right out of the centre of the final diorama.

David Roberts

Reflections on the build

The Europa collaboration: it feels like it started a long time ago, so where to start?

At first I was reluctant to get involved with the project.  I’m not very good at building things to a specification; indeed my entries into the Decisive Action 2 game on MOCpages were often about trying to subvert the categories.  For me Lego is somewhere I can be free of deadlines and the need to deliver quality, whatever the circumstances. Fortunately the “Private Club” is a very tolerant group of people, with a fairly relaxed schedule.  The joy of a virtual collaboration is that there is no external deadline of a show that everybody has to be ready for.

I was also worried that mine would be the only digital creation amongst the real bricks.  I render things on my old, currently disintegrating laptop. Modern standards are stunningly photo realistic but not mine!  Again the group was very welcoming and understanding that I don’t live with my bricks for 5 months of the year. I think it also speaks of Pico’s skill that all of the different builds and especially lighting setups have been so well mixed into a whole.  


The longer I’ve been involved in the Lego community, the more I’ve come to appreciate the skill of professional designers such as Pico.  A lot of what I build is all about shape and colour and pattern: abstract sculptures that have engines attached so that people accept them as spaceships.  However, when I look on Flickr at the models and presentations of people who work in the graphic design world, it often makes me wish I’d trained in something like that.

After all of my dithering, I was one of the last to join the project.  I wanted to crack on and get something built, as I didn’t want let my friends down and a busy working period was coming up.  Pods. I like pods. The pods in 2001: A Space Odyssey have always fascinated me. Either their shape or the way that they moved or perhaps it was that one of the astronauts was called “Dave”.  People have commented that my pod at the bottom of Europa’s ocean looks like a space pod and I did revisit and modify the design in real bricks in the first of my SHIPwreckers models, in SHIPtember 2016.  Yellow was the obvious main colour, as that seems to be the colour of most submersibles and would send a visual cue. Red was for high-vis and breaking up all of the red and adding a bit of contrast. I used a lot of 3675 3×3 corner slopes on the pod.  When I came to make it real bricks these were very expensive on Bricklink and if I’d realised, I wouldn’t have used so many on the submersible. I do like my virtual builds to “work” in real life: structurally and financially!

So thank to everyone in the group but especially Stephan for kicking it off, Pico for wrangling the images and David Alexander Smith for co-ordinating the written part.  It’s been a brilliant thing to have been part of again.


Thanks first and foremost to Pico for making this happen, and to all the other collaborators who added to the fun and creativity.  See links below to visit their individual pages.

Topsy Creatori


Marc Edge R Unde

David Roberts

David Alexander Smith

Caleb Inman

Nick Barrett

Stuart Lucas

Matt Rowntree

Tirrel Brown

Tom Remy

Stephan Niehoff

Pico van Grootveld

Plate Building

LEGO creations are three-dimensional constructs, or at least this is what popular opinion suggests. But of course there are the mosaic builders, resolutely committed to the pixilation and creation of the two-dimensional image. And then there is a third way, a way of building that last year got my creative juices flowing. A way of building on the liminal edge between dimensions: a way of building I decided to call relief plate building.


Radiate by David Alexander Smith


Modernist Veranda by David Alexander Smith


I had been building in two-dimensions for some time, but had wanted to find a new way of creating an image which activated the same creative choices that I used when painting. An ability to block in planes of colour, associate fields of brick against one another, quickly describe space through pattern, affect texture in two dimensions and ultimately reject ordinary spatial representation.


Layer Plate Study no. 1 by David Alexander Smith

Step forward the humble plate! One of the most important and un-sung heroes of the LEGO building system. I had boxes and boxes of the elements, which were normally used as structural, or as it were back-office jobs, in my builds. If I could bring them centre stage they might achieve the sort of visually diverse work I wanted to make.

I started with an experiment that used the wide array of angled plates in the LEGO system. By overlaying and offsetting these I started to explore angles and shaped patches of colour not normally achieved by the LEGO system’s fixed geometry. It became an experimental exercise in the generation of these shapes, and in doing so I realised an exciting secondary result of working in this way. As plates are layered, a depth similar to that found in relief sculpture was formed.

This sense of partial depth formed in the image drew the viewer’s eye into the work. Recognising the individual elements used to create the piece, whilst similarly immersing the viewer into the rhythm the elements expressed in their patternation. There occurred a way of hypnotically engaging the viewer; letting them follow the granular construction of the work, whilst simultaneously discovering the overall image in this movement.


Mother Board Complex by David Alexander Smith

It was the way into building abstract LEGO creations I had been searching for. A process that resisted seeing a LEGO model as a representation of a thing, and instead opened up a playful visual journey for a viewer through the pattern and forms of the bricks themselves.

Several more pattern-based abstract images followed.   In these I started to employ new strategies such as the bending of forms by finding new angles in the offset rotation of elements on their studs. Arabesques started to show up in the works; and with this came playful references to Art Deco and Bauhaus art movements.


Flowers of Romance by David Alexander Smith

As always, eager to explore the potential of this new way of working, I moved on to more literal image creation, although still with a knowing playful nod to its flat form. A plate mounted fish and a graphic robot being two of my favourites.


Mounted Fish by David Alexander Smith


Charlie Robot by David Alexander Smith

But it was the breaking of the traditional spatial representation in bricks that had really piqued my interest. At last a chance to explore the symbolic realms of visual creation I had been mining in my painting for years. These new works aligned with the painting experiments of the twentieth century and for me at last started to resonate the uncanny and emotive concerns I had wanted to explore in LEGO.


Hello Stranger by David Alexander Smith


Fool’s Garden by David Alexander Smith

So plate building has opened up a new space for me to explore, one that I hope will take my work on to new and uncharted waters. And so begins the work in developing the scale and scope of these pieces, ready to be shown at a LEGO convention in the not too distant future.


Graveyard by David Alexander Smith


Bad Bunny by David Alexander Smith

Talking Animation with David Pagano and David Pickett


David Pickett and David Pagano are two names synonymous with the art of brick filming and LEGO animation. They are also the co-authors of The LEGO Animation Book. Earlier this year they joined me to discuss how the book came about, their work and the future of LEGO animation.


We started our conversation by digging into both of the Davids’ pasts, searching for that elusive moment that got them hooked on animation.

David Pagano: When I was a kid my dad had a video camera; this was before everybody had a camera in their telephone.  It was a shoulder mounted VHS model with a tripod that could be attached to it.  My Dad used it to record home movies and birthday parties.  At some point, I don’t remember exactly when it was, he and I watched a stop motion documentary together – a behind the scenes type of thing.   I have a clear memory of me asking him if he could explain how you do “that thing where characters move but you don’t see your hands.”

I also had a friend whose dad did puppetry shows for children.  As a result, he had some experience with video cameras.  One day, when I was around 9 or 10 years old, we were hanging out in my bedroom where I had a long layout of a LEGO city.  He said “hey, why don’t we make a LEGO animation with your city set up here.” So he arranged my dad’s camera: he was the photographer and I was the animator. I’d used LEGO as a way to facilitate storytelling and make up little worlds before, so putting them on video was a very natural next step.

David Pickett:  Seeing as how similar mine and David’s stories are, my joke was going to be to just say “ditto” after all of his answers.  My family also had a video camera.  I actually have some video footage of me as a seven-year old kid who when they got a camera immediately wanted to use it to film everything.

The earliest LEGO film I made used the set 60506 Dragon Wagon to make a movie about a dragon.  It wasn’t animated, in fact in most of my early films I literally moved the characters around like little puppets, doing their voices as I recorded.   It’s actually something I’ve started doing again, as a lot of the content on my Youtube channel is simply me playing with the toys as opposed to professional animation.  The VHS tape of these early pieces is probably still in my parents’ basement –  there is a terrible Power Rangers rip off on it, which I know would be right up David Pagano’s alley!


Things moved on when I made my first LEGO film for a school project.   Anytime in school I could justify using a video to fulfil the requirement of an assignment I would, sometimes with LEGO, sometimes not.  At the time it was still rare for anyone to have video technology at home.  So I was the video guy as much as I was the LEGO guy at school.  It just seemed very natural to me that these two things I liked doing should combine.

My first animation probably wasn’t until I was around thirteen in middle school.  And then in college I had this epic animation that was 60 minutes long.  I realised when I screened it that I was becoming THE LEGO guy.  I made a very decisive choice at that point not to pursue live action filmmaking and focus instead on the LEGO niche.   So far it has worked out pretty well for me.

Having established the formative moments of both Davids careers we traced the journey from their early projects into professional practice.

David Pagano:  When LEGO Studios – the official LEGO line of filming sets – was released, they also ran a film competition to promote it.  By that point I had a capture card that I could use to tie my VHS camera into my computer, which finally let me do legit stop-motion animation.  My film was called Haunted and earned me a semi-finalist place, as well as a trip to New York City.  Which ironically is where I grew up.  My mum got a phone call from the LEGO Company: “You are never going to believe this, you and your family are going to New York City”… and my mum was like: “We are in Queens right now!” That was definitely the first time that I felt like this animation thing could be a career.


I actually didn’t go to college with the intention of doing animation.  I wanted to do live action work: the real ‘pro’ way to make films.  What I quickly learned was that live action involves a lot of cutting your teeth on other peoples’ projects, which you may have little to no interest in.  Whereas if I made an animated film, I could lock myself in a room for a couple of months and do all the work myself.

So I ended up taking the animation track.  In my senior year, I decided to make a LEGO film as my thesis. The thought was “I’m in college and I’m spending all this money to be here, so I might as well make the LEGO film now, because after I graduate no one is going to hire me to do this.”

The film I made was called Little Guys, and it has been unintentionally responsible for every stop-motion gig I’ve been hired for.  Most specifically, I brought it to the Brickworld Chicago fan event, which is the largest in North American.  (It’s where Dave Pickett and I first met too.) There I met a crew from the LEGO Company who liked my film and asked me to do some work for their in-house agency.  That’s how my weird hobby become a weird career making films with LEGO.

David Pickett:  I initially went to college to study biology and creative writing at the University of Chicago, mainly because it’s a cool liberal arts college and I knew I would get a broad education.  I spent all my free time in the student film group making LEGO movies and other stop-motion stuff for fun.   I made some really long convoluted movies, which I called LEGO Movie 2 and LEGO Movie 2 Vol. 2, which received positive responses.  But I wanted to reconceptualise what I could do, make it more friendly for the emerging trend of internet video sites such as YouTube.

So I came up with the idea of a LEGO web series; this became The Nightly News at Nine.  I spent a lot of time building up characters and a world in the summer of 2006; a short teaser with a few of the characters followed in 2007.  I then spent a further two years revising scripts for what would become Chapters 1 and 2.

I was in a screenwriting circle with some people I met in college.  We’d read each other’s scripts and give feedback.  I always like to emphasise how much time and effort it takes to make something funny and good.  For example, the original scripts had a war between the colours regular green and lime green. This original idea was more conceptual – the war between two gods to decide the official colour of jealousy – which I rejected in favour of the more direct opposition between orange and green.  The final 24-minute piece was cut up into smaller chunks of 5 minutes, which was small back then, but nowadays this is long even for YouTube.

This project ultimately became the basis for my YouTube channel BRICK 101. As of a year ago it has become my main job. The site has moved away from the animation work; it’s a mix of tutorial videos and reviews of LEGO products and other brands.  This helps me to be more profitable.  I have an office now, and a part-time employee.  This has really become my career path now, but it has gotten me away from animation.  I consider myself more of a construction block filmmaker nowadays.

This revelation brought the conversation round to how the LEGO Animation Book bought the two of them together to focus on an animation project.

David Pickett:  It was after the Nightly News at Nine Chapter 1 that we really started talking about writing a book together.

David Pagano: Dave and I have been teaching a LEGO stop-motion animation workshop for a decade.  When we first started, Dave and I would also sell DVDs of our animated films.  People would point to these and they would say “oh is that a DVD about how to make LEGO animations?”, and we would both sort of blush and say “No”. We just looked at each other one day and said we should make a how to book so people stop asking us for it.

David Pickett: As David mentioned we met in Chicago, where we were the only two people involved in making animations.  There was one other guy from Brick Films but he has moved on.  Repeatedly, we have been the only two brickfilmers at this event for the past decade.  The LEGO fan community hasn’t really seen many brick filmmakers, compared to any other sub-genre of LEGO fandom. With the book we really are just trying to create the next generation of LEGO filmmakers and hopefully get current adult fans to try something they didn’t do as a kid.

David Pagano: One of the stated goals of our book is to be the kind of book we would have wanted to read when we first got into brickfilming.  We wanted to answer the common questions and condense the first steps of brick filming into a digestible form.  Being a co-authored book it also offers our two differing perspectives.  We often finish each other’s – [David Pickett interjects] “sandwiches” – … hahah!  If we had written this book on our own we would mostly have focussed on our individual approaches to filmmaking. By writing it together it became more about us exploring the ways in which film making is possible based on our combined experiences.

David Pickett:  This is most pronounced in section 7 of the book where we talk about pre-production. I am all ‘play’ with only the minimum amount of planning.  The Magic Picnic is the most planned project I’ve ever done, because it was planned for a book, but also because I was working with David who has the most amazing spreadsheets.

David Pagano: I tend to plan out my films to a large extent, so that when I am on set I am ready to play, without having to worry where the lighting is etc.  I’ve started over the past 5-6 years, bringing other people into the fold to help me on my films, so I don’t have to keep all the details in my brain or on a spreadsheet. This lets me focus on the fun parts of animation.

David Pickett:  One of the best things about the reception of the book is hearing anecdotes about how it is helping kids’ creativity.  A couple of home schoolers have told us that the book has become a project for their summer curriculum.  Another reason why we made the book was that it was something that simply needed to exist in the universe.

A discussion followed as to how the book was practically written.

David Pagano: One year, after the Brickworld event, we hung out at Dave’s apartment and knocked out a very broad outline for what we thought the book would be.  Some of this came from the workshops we had been teaching together. We started to figure out what the key points and most asked questions were and went from there.

David Pickett:  In late 2010, David contacted me to write a ‘How to Animate’ article for Brick Journal Issue 14.   After that was released in April 2011, we talked again at Brickworld, and that’s when Dave stayed over at my apartment.  One of the key things we decided at that point was whether the content would make more sense as a series of videos or a book.  We decided that a book and an animation developed together would be the best option. We started a website, now known as the Set Bump, originally Brick Animation, to support the project.


Between 2011 and 2013 we did lots of pre-production work.  I think we officially started writing the book when the LEGO Movie came out in 2014.  We saw it together and went back to my hotel room to start work. David lives in New York and I live in Chicago, so a lot of the creative stuff was done when we were together.

David Pagano: Trying to make the Magic Picnic at the same time as writing the book was a hilarious and insane idea.  One can’t exist without the other—the photography from the book is directly from the set of the Magic Picnic, and these images, to some extent, dictated the text.  The difficulty came in juggling the interrelation of the two projects and meeting deadlines.

David Pickett: It was hard to write a draft of the book with zero photos in it. Our publisher couldn’t comprehend it without seeing the photos.  Having an animation tie in with the book was a huge interlocking puzzle, which at times was extremely frustrating.  Chapter three specifically will make David whimper.

We divided up the work for the book and the animation.  Each of us took the lead for different chapters and passed these back and forth to review.  Similarly, we split the Magic Picnic up, I did town, castle, and pirate and David did space and the robot battle. Having a story about inter-dimensional travel hid the differences between our cameras and was also a shout out to the classic brickfilm, the Magic Portal. It also contains references to the history of LEGO themes, Power Rangers and the 1980s LEGO Idea books.

David Pagano:  Our goal was to make sure that you could not see which parts of the film are me or Dave Pickett. We wanted it to feel cohesive. But if you pay close attention, it should be possible to see which parts were made by each David.

David and David moved on to discuss their respective animation styles.

David Pickett:  Let me talk about David Pagano in terms of a throughline in his work: his PaganoPuppet, which debuted in Playback. These are large scale brick built figures, but not as large as those in Little Guys.  They have human articulations and brick-built mouths.  They feature in his finest commissioned work Country Buildin’; a country music video with the two cowboys live lip syncing to the song of the same name.  It is probably the perfect blend of the needs of the client and David’s personal style.

In addition to the way David has refined his animation and his production process he has also refined the actual LEGO build over the years.  The original version of the character in Playback is not as refined as those in Country Buildin’.  The PaganoPuppet was then revised again, based on the availability of new pieces, when we did the instructions for our book.  It has also shown up in other animators’ works.  Also, non-animators have used it in their work. Monster Brick (Matt Armstrong), for example, has made lots of different interpretations of that base model.

In addition, David’s walk cycle diagram is part of an internal official LEGO document for how the minifigure can be used in any stop-motion animation they produce, whether it’s made by Paganomation or one of their other contractors.

When I was working on the book, I spent a lot of time looking at David’s work, and deconstructing what he does in his animations.  My favourite example is the arm nod, as a way of showing consent or a “yeah that is a great idea!”

David Pagano: What I admire in Dave’s work, especially in his animation, is something I don’t have as much experience with: writing.  So when Dave talks about how long he spent writing the Nightly News at Nine, I’m both impressed and envious.  I just haven’t made the time to develop my own stuff in the way he has.

However, there is an additional artistic l element to Dave’s work that is very important too.  I work in a building with Sean Kenney – the brick artist – and one argument that comes up over and over again is the idea that there are certain LEGO artworks or LEGO artists where the work is made of LEGO bricks but it doesn’t go beyond that.  One nice thing about the Nightly News at Nine is that it is made of LEGO and is a technically proficient build, but it also says stuff about Dave and gets his ideas into the world.  At my studio, the way we describe great works of LEGO art is that “LEGO can be the beginning of the conversation but it shouldn’t be the end.”

This idea turned the conversation around to the theme of what makes a LEGO artwork, and how storytelling and narrative forms are essential to LEGO animation.

David Pagano:  Accessibility is a word that comes up often when we have this conversation.  Anyone can go to a LEGO sculpture show or a fan convention, see how a piece is built, and can go home and try it themselves.  More so than say when you see a watercolour painting in an exhibition. Because LEGO is a toy first and art medium second, there is a lower barrier to entry.

David Pickett:  One thing that elevates great brickfilms is that there is more to them than just technique. A 4K video of a minifigure walking across the floor is not art, nor is it interesting.   I wrote an article about this that looked at the dangers of hyper-reality.  It analysed the mania for technical perfection that prevented film makers from finishing their work or telling meaningful stories.  So much LEGO animation is focused on spectacle.  Spectacle is always a part of entertainment, and art to a certain extent, but pure spectacle seems empty.

I have much more compassion and interest in technically terrible brickfilms made by a kid trying to say something.  A kid doing a poorly animated film about her family is way more interesting than a shot by shot recreation of the latest Star Wars trailer. I hate that the latter is all some people think of when they think of LEGO animation.

David Pagano:  It was important that the Magic Picnic embodied these ideas.  In Chapter 6 of our book we talk about how important play is in the development of a brickfilm.

When I started doing videos for the LEGO Group back in 2008, the company was coming back from near bankruptcy, trying to figure out what they needed to do to be vibrant and profitable again.  Back then they were more willing to take a chance on a video starring a talking mailbox or lumberjacks with magic powers than they are now. Some of the playfulness has gone out of the company’s recent adverts.

This opened up a conversation around the recent LEGO films.

David PaganoThe LEGO Movie is interesting for us because we both have an encyclopaedic knowledge of the rubbish put out by the LEGO group over the years.  If you look at LEGO Friends as a lifelong fan, it is such an improvement over Belville and Scala, but if you look at it from outside the lens of LEGO fandom, it appears as if all of a sudden LEGO is catering to girls.  The LEGO Movie is kind of the same thing – “LEGO has started to get into the film business and got it right the first time.”  Well not quite!  There were a lot of failures before the hit.

David Pickett:  There is this really excellent Henry Selick quote: “Every kid has a toy that they believe is their best friend, that they believe communicates with them, and they imagine it being alive, their toy horse or car or whatever it is. Stop-motion is the only medium where we literally can make a toy come to life, an actual object.” I’ve printed this out and put it on my wall.  When I think of the connection between toys and storytelling, stop-motion animation is just the playing without the hand present. The LEGO Movie embodies this idea even more than most current current LEGO products.  It communicates something deep about creativity.  The fact that you build the thing on the box, or the 3 things that there are instructions for; vs the idea that you can build anything you want to.  It’s a weird paradox and the conflict between LEGO as a concept and a product that is sold, and what it means culturally.

But I also wonder about this from a story telling perspective, what does it mean to be a ‘LEGO’ story.  So I think about all the LEGO themes (Star Wars, Batman, etc.) that reinvent these properties.  The key theme I see between these is a self-aware ability to poke fun at something that is generally dramatic.  For instance what the LEGO Company did with the Travellers Tales Star Wars games and TV shows; these are pretty irreverent. The LEGO Movie is like The ‘LEGO LEGO’ movie, in that it both celebrates and parodies the LEGO brand itself.

On this note we ended our discussion, with a nod to the power of humour and parody in LEGO animation, and a timely reminder to just what makes both David Pickett and David Pagano’s animations so much fun to watch.

David Hughes at OXO Gallery


If you turn the corner from Gabriel’s wharf towards the OXO Tower on London’s Southbank this week you will be greeted by the sight of one of David Hughes’ amazing LEGO sculptures.  Taking centre stage in the west facing window of the OXO Gallery is his The Stuff I Didn’t See, a hunched LEGO figure that reflects on the emotional effects of depression.


The Stuff I Didn’t See by David Hughes

This and a number of Hughes’ other pieces contribute to the collective Caiger Contemporary Art Show MEGALOPOLIS, and fulfils the promise he made to me to me last year when I interviewed him, that he wanted to take LEGO art into mainstream art spaces.  It is something he has been doing for a while now, being featured at Clerkenwell Design Week in May, displaying at the Park Theatre Gallery Space in January as well as regularly turning up to the various London art fairs.


But this show is different, here for the first time his work avoids the novelty often associated with LEGO art.  Rather than it being a surprise to find LEGO in a gallery, the LEGO art presents itself as a facet of a wide range of creative practices on show.  Fitting in with the exhibition’s aims which declare that: ‘The world seems a bit of a divided place at the moment, so we wanted to celebrate its awesomeness and how it unifies us all.’


Bowie by David Hughes hung in context

Sympathetically curated Hughe’s works are distributed throughout the show, with his Bowie portrait mosaic, collaboratively created at Roy’s People’s Art Fair last month, sitting between paintings and prints by more traditional artists.  And in this context the work ceases to be only about its LEGO built nature and becomes something else, a work of art that just happens to have been built with bricks.


Leave Me Alone, Don’t Leave Me Alone by David Hughes

Hughes’ most recent works, the aforementioned The Stuff I Didn’t See and its sister piece Leave Me Alone, Don’t Leave Me Alone, are the stars of the show.  Where he steps beyond works that chime with popular culture or express the human body, often dancers, in architectural terms, and explores the themes of mental illness, the choice of building with LEGO bricks truly attains its potential as a medium for thoughtful content.  In these pieces he takes some of the aesthetic traits of more famous LEGO artists such as Nathan Sawaya, but by playfully selecting the perfect scale for brick recognition and image resolution to oscillate, achieves something more interesting.  The contradictions between a sense of self and its desire for both social interaction and isolation, suggested by a piece like Leave Me Alone, Don’t Leave Me Alone, is perfectly reflected in the LEGO brick medium, which jumps between visual cohesion and a reduction to individual elements if the viewer gets too close.

The show is on till the 15 October, and is free.  If you happen to be in London this weekend and want a chance to see what is happening in the world of LEGO art, a trip to the OXO Gallery is well worth the visit.




Abstract Experiments in LEGO

Last year I wrote a short article on the issues of building abstract LEGO creations. What happens when you try to use LEGO elements in a non-representational way, and in doing so does it tell us anything more about the way LEGO operates as a creative language?

Having set out a series of arguments about this, I decided to enlist the help of several talented builders to test my theses in a practical way. Here is what they came up with.

Shannon Sproule
Shannon is a superb builder of the most unusual and innovative space creations as well as being an accomplished artist in more traditional mediums. He approached the challenge of building in the abstract form from a symbolic angle, creating three fascinating comments on social/group dynamics, love and the construction of the self. You can find more of Shannon’s work on his Flickr pager here.


Protect Punish 1.jpg


A rectangular object has a binary nature: either it is standing erect (implying strength) or laying prone (implying placidity). We see a group of erect objects surrounding a prone object and questions are posed to the viewer: is the group protecting the lesser object from danger or encircling it with intend to harm whilst it is alone? Does the viewer identify with the reposed or with the group?

Romeo and Juliet

Romeo and Juliet 1.jpg

Romeo and Juliet

A beautiful object emerges from a nest of angry thorns. The central object represents the ill-fated lovers Romeo and Juliet, white symbolising the purity of their love for one another. A ragged divide splits the object in two, while the thorns on opposing sides (representing the two feuding families), shot red with hatred and adorned with metallic talons, scrape and gouge at one another, oblivious to the broken jewel in front of them.

Components of the Self (moving through space)

Components of the Self 1.jpg

Components of the Self (moving through space)

Here I am contemplating the ingredients of the Self. The light bley spine represents our body. It is the basic frame/chassis that the higher elements are further built upon. The white platform in the centre (the brain) serves as a foundation or growth medium for the Unique Attributes to affix to. These elements (in medium azure) equate to our many and curious unique traits, acquired skills and collected memories.

So the Self is the sum of the particular combination of its parts. All ‘Selves’ are unique and all have inherent value; though the scaffolding may be large, small, damaged or not, curved or straight, etc, the Unique Attributes continue to grow.

Tom Remy
Tom has made his name in the fan community building amazing portraits as well as super-realistic objects, and a whole host of space designs. Breaking from his normal approach, he tackled the challenge through a focus on constraints and building techniques. You can find more of Tom’s work on his Flickr page here.

Kaleidoscopic Rose


Kaleidoscopic Rose

This piece experimented with a limited amount of LEGO elements as a way to induces an interesting creative process. I gave myself three constraints: 1) to use only transparent elements, 2) to push a little further the well known “brick/rod/brick” curved-wall technique, and 3) to achieve something with a radial symmetry.

With all that, I ended up with only one satisfying shape and here it is. This is pure geometric abstraction, and the shape is the fruit of its own internal logic, without any secret meaning or intention.

One More Dimension


One More Dimension

My second attempt took a completely different approach: this piece is built with conventional techniques. It depicts a pair of two-dimensional paths that have to painfully break into a third dimension in order to connect.

Lego is an inspiring medium for this kind of stuff, because it provides very rigid and regular structure and palette; but I had to make it smaller than intended due to parts limitation.




My third piece started with no plan or purpose. I was just feeling the colours and working with them in a basic mosaic format.

Tim Clark
Tim is one of the premier science fiction builders in the community, using detailed greebling to decorate huge spacecraft. For this challenge he took these skills and techniques and turned them to the task of abstract image building. You can find more of Tim’s work on his Flickr page here.

A Violent Intelligence

A Violent Intelligence 1.jpg

A Violent Intelligence

To be honest, when David first presented me with this challenge, I didn’t expect that it would be particularly challenging. Sometimes, when I feel my creativity has been stymied, I may pull out a large plate and build random details, or ‘greebles,’ just to tinker and explore different effects that I haven’t previously considered. In fact, I have, in the past, built an entire MOC based on just this concept. Point is, this kind of work is right up my alley.

With this MOC, however, I wanted to submit something that has the look of what was certainly crafted by my fingers, but with an aspect to which I’ve never given much thought. So I decided to build what I truly love: A science-fiction flavored piece, but with a tenuous marriage to a theme that I tend to shy away from: absolutely anything organic. I didn’t want to introduce much colour to this work, fearing that it would draw too much from the form and intention of the finished product, so I kept the organic components black. When the piece was filled in, I decided the composition was a bit drab, so I added a few splashes of yellow.

A very short time into this build, although it was never my goal to allow the work to be a realistic depiction of any singular thing, I began to feel that what was unfolding before me was a mechanical establishment of some variety which had been subverted by a life-form defined only by its instinctual survivalist tendencies. My initial reaction was to abandon my progress as I saw it starting to take on a bit too much personality, almost to the point of identity, but rather than combat this outcome that I probably could have predicted if I gave it even a second’s contemplation, I embraced it and allowed it to continue to take shape to completion.

I discovered that what I hadn’t previously considered to be a challenging undertaking, indeed had its own set of hurtles. Normally, when I’m adding greebles to a work, the task begins with defining parameters, then filling in the area with details that give the impression of mechanics, and I feel that the most effective greebles are pressed into a recessed area. In this case, the parameters are the borders of the very work itself, forcing me to stretch what is usually confined to a tight space, and all the detail of this work is above the frame, making it appear more like a circular section cut out of a whole. There is also the aspect of having to repress my need to give the viewer, (even if that viewer is me), an identifiable piece.

What I found to be the most trying aspect of this experiment, though, was having to decide that it was finished.

Despite the fact that I think it’s a bit more than strictly nonrepresentational, I’m actually pleased with the result. I have entitled the piece, ‘A Violent Intelligence.’

David Roberts
David has merged irreverent humour and expert engineering experience to create his own unique take on the LEGO space universe. These same skills were utilised for this experiment. You can find more of David’s work on his Flickr page here.




I made the black wall because I had a lot of the bricks and I like the pattern, texture and the way that the bricks attached to each other, on their corners. The yellow ball was an experiment with techniques but I like how it goes on the black background. The red card behind was a conscious choice.

As with so much of what I build, it’s about colour, pattern, texture and shape. A lot of my spaceships start as shapes or patterns and are really just abstract ABS sculptures that happen to have rocket engines and pilots in order to make them socially acceptable to the Lego cognoscenti on Flickr (honest!).

Caleb Inman
Caleb is an innovative builder with several strings to his bow. Most notably his experiments in portraiture have shown some truly innovative lateral piece usage, which always result in stunning creations. The only builder to utilise LDD, he ran with the automatic building aspects of abstract creation. You can find more of Caleb’s work on his Flickr pager here.




I presented this build through a pretty simple edit, and I can’t decide if I like it or not. It’s meant to look harsh, but the simplicity might work against it.

I think it is about as abstract as possible, since I had very little direction or intention while building it. I let my inner sense of connections and creativity direct how I built, following from a vague idea in my head (and sketch I made on paper beforehand).